Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Long term durability of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: outcomes from a contemporary cohort from a tertiary reference center at 5-years and beyond
Session:
CO 24 - Interventional Cardiology -TAVI
Speaker:
Gustavo Sá Mendes
Congress:
CPC 2021
Topic:
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Theme:
25. Interventional Cardiology
Subtheme:
25.4 Interventional Cardiology - Other
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Gustavo Sá Mendes; Pedro m. Lopes; Rui Campante Teles; Pedro Araújo Gonçalves; Luís Raposo; João Abecasis; João Brito; Tiago Nolasco; Márcio Madeira; Afonso Oliveira Félix; Mariana Gonçalves; Miguel Mendes; Manuel de Sousa Almeida
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTaa483906.BI",sans-serif">Background and aim: </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">Long-term data on the durability of transcatheter heart valves is scarce. This is of particular interest as indications expand to younger and lower surgical risk patients. We sought to assess the incidence of long-term structural valve dysfunction (SVD) and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) in a cohort of patients with TAVR who reached at least 5-year follow-up, as compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), performed within the same time-frame at the same institution.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTaa483906.BI",sans-serif">Methods and Results: </span><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">Consecutive patients with at least 5-year available follow-up, who underwent TAVR between November 2008 to December 2015 in a tertiary single center, were included. From a group of 246 patients undergoing TAVR, 126 had available follow-up data (age at implantation: 83.0 [77.8 - 87.0] years; EuroScore II: 4.54 [2.60 - 6.29]%; follow-up: 5.94 [5.06 - 7.67] years). First generation Corevalve® and Sapien® prosthesis were implanted in 56% and 38% patients, respectively. SVD and BVF were defined according to the new consensus statement from the EAPCI endorsed by the ESC and the EACTS. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">Mean transaortic pressure gradients decreased from 53.2 ±1.3 mmHg (pre-TAVR)</span></span> <span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">to 10.4 ±0.4 mmHg (at discharge or up to one-year after TAVR, p<0.001), and there was a small non-significant increase at the fifth-year and the last available follow-up (11.2 ±0.6 mmHg; 14.7 ±1.8 mmHg, respectively). </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">Moderate and severe SVD were reported in 12 and 4 patients, respectively (8-year cumulative incidence function to SVD: 2.67%; 95% CI, 2.12 </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvTTec369687+20",sans-serif">- 3.89</span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">). Of these 8 had BVF, 7 of them with hospitalization for acute heart failure. A total of 4 patients died and none required reintervention (redo TAVR or SAVR). BVF for non-SVD were observed in 4 patients (2 subclinic thrombosis successfully treated with anticoagulation and 2 paravalvular regurgitation due to endocarditis).</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">As comparator, from a cohort of 587 patients submitted to biological SAVR, 247 (age 75.0 [70.0 - 79.0] years; EuroScore II 1.43 [1.06 - 2.17]%) had available long-term follow-up (6.89 [6.08 - 8.19] years). Moderate and severe SVD were reported in 42 and 3 patients, respectively (8-year cumulative incidence function to SVD: 3.13%; 95% CI, 2.45</span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvTTec369687+20",sans-serif">-4.21</span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">). These events were clinically relevant (BVF) in 19 of them: 8 performed TAVR valve-in-valve procedures and 3 redo SAVR. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">At the fifth-year of follow-up the incidence of SVD was not statistically different between TAVR (8%) and SAVR (15%), with a p for comparison of 0.137.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTaa483906.BI",sans-serif">Conclusions</span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTaa483906.BI+20",sans-serif">: </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">In our population of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated with </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:AdvOTe521d66a+fb">fi</span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"AdvOTe521d66a",sans-serif">rst-generation percutaneous bioprostheses, TAVR was associated with a low incidence of BVF and SVD at the long-term follow-up. These outcomes seem indistinct from those occurring in patients submitted to conventional SAVR. </span></span></span></span></p>
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site