Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Clinical Insights: Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Puncture in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A Comprehensive Analysis of Vascular Complications and Mortality Rates
Session:
Sessão de Posters 47 - TAVI
Speaker:
Marta Miguez Vilela
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Theme:
25. Interventional Cardiology
Subtheme:
25.3 Non-coronary Cardiac Intervention
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Marta Miguez De Freitas Vilela; Catarina Simões de Oliveira; Ana Margarida Martins; Ana Beatriz Garcia; Ana Abrantes; Catarina Gregório; Miguel Nobre Menezes; João Silva Marques; Cláudia Jorge; Pedro Carrilho Ferreira; Pedro Cardoso; Fausto J. Pinto
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Introduction</strong>: </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Arterial femoral access is the most commonly utilized access point for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is recognized for its association with bleeding and vascular complications. Precise placement of the femoral sheath is crucial to avoid complications, making ultrasound (US)-guided puncture an indispensable tool.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Objective</strong>: </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">To compare the incidence of vascular complications between US-guided and non-US-guided femoral punctures.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods</strong>: </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">A single-center study was conducted on consecutive patients (pts) undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Vascular complications were documented and further classified as minor (small dissection without flow compromise and small subcutaneous hematoma) and major complications. A comparative analysis between US-guided and non US-guided punctures and 30-day mortality rates were reported. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were employed.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results</strong>: </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">A total of 601 pts underwent transfemoral TAVR, with 54% being female (mean age of 82 years). The main co-morbidities included arterial hypertension (91.9%), dyslipidemia (76.3%), diabetes (37.4%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD, 29.6%). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">In 17.5% of TAVR, femoral artery puncture was US-guided. Major vascular complications (91 cases) and minor complications (50 cases) were observed – graphic 1. US-guided puncture was associated with fewer vascular complications (p<0.001), including major complications (p=0.017), and was also linked to fewer blood transfusion (p=0.018). Among patient co-morbidities, CKD was associated with vascular complications (p=0.020), and renal function replacement therapy was linked to major complications (p=0.048). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">The main closures devices used were Perclose and MANTA, with the last associated with a lower incidence of vascular complications (p=0.035). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">CKD and US-guided puncture emerged as independent predictors of vascular complications, with CKD posing a 1.6x increased risk (OR=1.57, CI 1-2.4) and US-guided puncture indicating a 3x decreased risk (OR=3, CI 1.3-7.7). Vascular complications were correlated with both in-hospital and 30-day mortality (p=0.005).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Conclusion</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">: </span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">US-guided femoral puncture independently predicts a lower incidence of vascular complications, which, in turn, are associated with higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates. This evidence supports the recommendation that US-guided puncture should be considered the standard of care for patients undergoing TAVR.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site