Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
The Dual Challenge: Understanding and Managing Pulmonary Hypertension in Congenital Heart Defects
Session:
Sessão de Posters 49 - Cardiopatias Congénitas
Speaker:
Ana Margarida Martins
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
Subtheme:
20.6 Congenital Heart Disease – Clinical
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Ana Margarida Martins; Ana Beatriz Garcia; Catarina Oliveira; Daniel Cazeiro; Pedro Alves da Silva; Tatiana Guimarães; Ana Rita Francisco; Ana Mineiro; Susana Martins; Nuno Lousada; Fausto J Pinto; Rui Plácido
Abstract
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Introduction</strong>:</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a well-known consequence of congenital heart disease (affecting 5-10% of this pts) and conveying a worse prognosis. This subgroup comprises an increasing proportion of PAH pts, adding complexity due to underlying anatomical and hemodynamic abnormalities. Additionally, most PAH clinical trials focus on pts with idiopathic or CTD-associated PH, with little evidence regarding CHD.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Our aim was to characterize a population with CHD and PH followed in a tertiary centre from 2012-2022 and assess clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters that could influence prognosis.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Methods</strong>: Observational single centre retrospective study including pts followed in a reference hospital for PH associated with CHD. Clinical, laboratorial, echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic data were collected at beginning and during follow-up. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Results</strong>: We analysed 30 pts with CHD-associated PH. Mean age was 53,8 ± 17 years, with female predominantly represented (63,3%). Atrial septal defect (ASD) was the most prevalent CHD (66,6% - 80% simple ASD, 15% with anomalous venous return, and 5% with patent ductus arteriosus), followed by ventricular septal defect (16,6%) and patent ductus arteriosus (10%). During a mean follow-up of 4,7 ± 3 years, 26.7 % pts died (n=8), and 46,7% were hospitalized (n=14) mostly due to heart failure. For the specified FUP, only 7 pts were deemed eligible for surgery; the remainder started PH-directed therapy: 2 were under monotherapy, 15 had double therapy with PDE5i and endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and 6 had triple therapy including selexipag.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">On univariate Cox analysis, NTproBNP (p=0.011), 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD) (p= 0.036), right atrial area (p= 0.021) and PSAP (p=0.045) correlated with cardiovascular events defined as a composite endpoint of death and cardiovascular admission. On multivariate analysis, only 6MWD (OR=0.99, 95%CI 0.98-0.99, p=0.029) was an independent predictor of CV outcomes.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Since 6MWD was the sole strongest prognostic index, we identified 270m as the best cutoff for predicting CV outcomes after ROC curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups (Log Rank 5.45, p=0.02) (Fig.1), emphasizing its prognostic value and better tailoring the therapy for each patient.</span></span></p> <p> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Despite its lower representativeness in clinical trials, CHD remains an important cause for PH with a significant impact in mortality and CV admissions. Physical performance status, as evaluated by 6MWD, was seen as the most significant prognostic factor in our population, and those with less capacity displayed a far worse prognosis, reinforcing its importance in initial evaluation and need for early therapeutic intervention.</span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site