Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Heart failure etiology and ARNI+SGLT2i initiation may influence ICD implantation timing
Session:
Sessão de Posters 37 - Insuficiência cardíaca - Terapêutica farmacológica
Speaker:
Jéni Quintal
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
D. Heart Failure
Theme:
10. Chronic Heart Failure
Subtheme:
10.6 Chronic Heart Failure - Clinical
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Jéni Quintal; Sara Gonçalves; Tatiana Duarte; Pedro Carreira; Hugo Viegas; Margarida Madeira; Leonor Parreira; Dinis Valbom Mesquita; Rita Marinheiro; Rui Antunes Coelho; Ermelinda Pedroso; Filipe Seixo
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Background: </span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended in patients (pts) with symptomatic Heart Failure (HF) and a left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) </span></span></span><em><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Cambria Math",serif"><span style="color:#1d1d1d">≤</span></span></span></em><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">35% despite </span></span></span><em><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Cambria Math",serif"><span style="color:#1d1d1d">≥</span></span></span></em><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">3 months of optimal medical therapy (OMT) to reduce the risk of sudden death and all-cause mortality. However, the optimal timing of ICD implantation remains unclear and LVEF often recovers beyond 3 months of OMT. The impact of new neurohormonal therapies (NNHT) - ARNI/SGLT2i - is also unclear.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Purpose</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">: </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:black">To evaluate long term LVEF recovery in pts with implanted ICD after 3 months of OMT, LVEF predictors of recovery and the impact of NNHT.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Methods</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">: </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study. Patients with symptomatic HF with LVEF </span></span></span><em><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Cambria Math",serif"><span style="color:#1d1d1d">≤</span></span></span></em><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">35% despite 3 months of OMT who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2023 were included. Basal characteristics were determined. The population was divided in 2 groups: pts with recovered LVEF (gA) and pts without LVEF recovery (gB). The groups were compared regarding etiology, therapy and adverse events (arrhythmias, HF hospital readmission and all-cause mortality).</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Results</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">: </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">This cohort included 114 pts with a mean age of 62 (</span></span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:Symbol"><span style="color:#1d1d1d">±</span></span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d"> 9) years and an 83% male predominance. There was a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors as depicted in Table 1. </span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">After a median follow-up (FUP) time of 44 (1-127) months, 16 (14.4%) pts recovered, 52.6% improved and 9.6% deteriorated LVEF. When comparing the groups, a significant difference in HF etiology was verified, with DNICMP being more common (56.3% vs. 15.8%, p=0.014) and ischemic ICMP less common (43.8 vs. 77.9%, p=0.038) in gA. Median time until LVEF recovery was 27 (2-135) months. Notably, 56.3% of pts only recovered LVEF after ARNI and SGLT2i initiation (56.3%, p=0.001) within a median time of 19 (4-35) months. DNICMP </span></span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">[Exp (beta) 95% CI: 2.05 [2.36 – 25.53, p=0.001], </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">ICMP </span></span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">[Exp (beta) 95% CI: -1.69 [0.06 – 0.59, p=0.004] and concomitant therapy with ARNI and SGLT2i [Exp (beta) 95% CI: 1.52 [1.11 – 18.88, p=0.035] were independent predictors of LVEF recovery in multivariate analysis.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Only 1 pt in gA required ICD therapy, 63 months after ICD implantation, making ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation with ATP or ICD shock significantly more common in gB (6.3 vs. 17.9%; p=0.001). Overall median time until ICD therapy was 43 months. Hospital readmission due to HF and all-cause mortality were more common in gB (6.3% vs. 22.1%, p=0.021; 0 vs. 25.3%, p=0.036).</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Conclusion</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">: </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book""><span style="color:#1d1d1d">Our study suggests ICD implantation delay beyond the standard 3 months of OMT may be reasonable, particularly in pts with DNIMCD. ARNI/SGLT2-i initiation significantly contributed to LVEF recovery, hinting at a role in avoiding unnecessary ICD implantation in selected pts. This underscores the need for personalized timing based on HF etiology and NNHT impact for more effective therapeutic strategies.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site