Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in Brugada patients
Session:
Sessão de Posters 28 - Morte súbita cardíaca
Speaker:
Ana Margarida Martins
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
Theme:
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
Subtheme:
08.4 Ventricular Arrhythmias and SCD - Treatment
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Ana Margarida Martins; Ana Beatriz Garcia; Catarina Oliveira; Miguel Raposo; Ana Abrantes; Catarina Gregório; Joana Brito; Afonso Nunes Ferreira; Gustavo Lima da Silva; Nuno Cortez-Dias; Fausto J.Pinto; João de Sousa
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><u><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"><span style="color:#212121"><span style="background-color:white">Introduction</span></span></span></u></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"><span style="color:#212121"><span style="background-color:white">Brugada Syndrome (BS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic syndrome associated with an increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Risk assessment in BS is controversial, which makes the decision to use an implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in these patients difficult. Indication and prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is still a matter of debate. </span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><u><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"><span style="color:#212121"><span style="background-color:white">Purpose</span></span></span></u></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"><span style="color:#212121"><span style="background-color:white">To determine the association between electrophysiological study (EFS) results and arrhythmic endpoints.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><u><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Methods </span></u></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">A prospective analysis of asymptomatic BS patients followed in a tertiary hospital was conducted, considering those who have performed PVS for risk stratification. The endpoint of interest was a composite of arrhythmic death, aborted cardiac arrest and appropriately triggered ICD shock.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><u><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Results</span></u></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">We enrolled 71 asymptomatic BS patients (65% male, mean age 53 ± 13 years) with a mean follow-up time of 7 years. All patients exhibited type 1 ECG pattern, which occurred spontaneously in 61 % of patients. Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) was performed in both right ventricular apex (RVA) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in 55% of patients and isolated in RVA or RVOT in 41% and 4%, respectively. The protocol was performed using ventricular paced drive trains at two cycles (600 and 400 ms), adding 2 or 3 premature stimulations to ventricular refractory period. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 32% of patients and non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 3% of them. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Patients with sustained or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia induced by PVS had a significantly higher arrhythmogenic event rate (arrhythmic death, aborted cardiac arrest or appropriately triggered ICD shock) during follow-up, as indicated by the Kaplan Meier curve (p=0,028, figure 1). Seventy-two percent of these patients had an ICD implanted. No patient suffered arrhythmic death. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><u><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Conclusion</span></u></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">These data suggest that in asymptomatic BS patients, inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias during PVS are associated with arrhythmogenic events during follow-up, being of importance in risk stratification. </span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site