Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Urea Levels at Admission: A Forgotten Yet Crucial Prognostic Marker in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients
Session:
Sessão de Posters 21 - Insuficiência cardíaca aguda
Speaker:
Simão Pedro Almeida Carvalho
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
Theme:
11. Acute Heart Failure
Subtheme:
11.2 Acute Heart Failure – Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Simão De Almeida Carvalho; Carlos Costa; Adriana Pacheco; Tiago Aguiar; Diana Carvalho; Andreia Fernandes; Mesquita Bastos; Ana Briosa
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Introduction:</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Heart failure represents a significant health concern marked by heightened morbidity and mortality, with each hospital admission posing potential risks for adverse outcomes. Identifying predictors of these outcomes holds vital importance, shaping healthcare decisions regarding hospitalization necessity and optimal care. Renal function intricately intertwines with the cardiovascular system, influencing cardiac function. Elevated urea levels often manifest in contexts linked to heart failure decompensation, reflecting impaired renal function and heightened cardiac stress.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Objective:</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Evaluate the prognostic significance of urea levels upon admission in hospitalized patients experiencing decompensated heart failure.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods:</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">A single-center cross-sectional study comprised 619 hospitalized patients experiencing decompensated heart failure. Statistical analyses, including Independent-Samples T Test, Chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier analysis, were performed using SPSS software. A ROC analysis was conducted to classify groups based on a urea cutoff for the 1-year composite endpoint. This composite endpoint encompassed readmission, return visits to the Emergency Department attributable to heart failure, and mortality.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results:</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">A total of 619 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 79.4 years, and 40.9% were female. The average length of hospital stay was 4.1 days. The mean Nt-proBNP at admission was 8651 pg/mL. Among the patients, 45.2% had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 43.1%. The average follow-up time was 244.5 days. ROC analysis demonstrated the highest accuracy for the 1-year composite endpoint with a Urea cutoff of approximately 80 mg/dL.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Patients above the 80 mg/dL urea cutoff exhibited higher creatinine (1.3 vs. 1.0 mg/dL), lower systolic/diastolic blood pressure at admission (129.4/68.2 vs. 138.7/75.4 mmHg), and elevated NT-proBNP (13053 vs. 5975). While LVEF was similar, Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (SPAP) was higher (53.3 vs. 46.0 mmHg). Elevated urea levels consistently correlated with higher risk across intra-hospital mortality, 30-day, 1-year, and total follow-up analyses.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Kaplan-Meier analysis for the composite endpoint revealed a significant difference (p<0.001), indicating shorter time-to-event in patients with higher admission urea levels.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Conclusion:</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">The findings suggest a strong link between elevated urea levels and adverse clinical indicators (blood pressure, NT-proBNP, SPAP), consistently associated with worse outcomes across different follow-up durations. Patients with elevated urea levels experienced faster occurrence of the composite primary endpoint. Further validation of the cutoff's clinical relevance is warranted, yet the initial urea measurement shows promise in predicting prognosis for hospitalized Heart Failure patients.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site