Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
SGLT2i on transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: a new drug for an under-recognized cardiomyopathy
Session:
Sessão de Posters 14 - Amiloidose Cardíaca
Speaker:
Catarina Gregório
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.4 Myocardial Disease – Treatment
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Catarina Gregório; Ana Beatriz Garcia; Ana Margarida Martins; Catarina Simões de Oliveira; Miguel Azaredo Raposo; Ana Abrantes; João Santos Fonseca; Daniel Inácio Cazeiro; Marta Vilela; Fausto J. Pinto; Dulce Brito; João R. Agostinho
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><strong>Introduction:</strong> Transthyretin (TTR) stabilizing therapy successfully delays disease progression and reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to be beneficial in heart failure (HF) patients independently of ejection fraction. However, patients with ATTR-CM were excluded form SGLT2i trials, some small observation studies have demonstrated that SGLT2i do not negatively affect hemodynamics in ATTR-CM patients and can present a safety profile in this subgroup of patients.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><strong>Aim:</strong> To assess SGLT2i tolerability, impact in clinical outcomes and changes in NTproBNP in patients with ATTR-CM.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective study of ATTR-CM patients treated with tafamidis 61 mg followed in a tertiary center. Patients who were treated with SGLT2i were compared to a group of patients that were never treated with SGLT2i – control group. Clinical, demographic and echocardiographic parameters, as well as HF admissions, were collected and compared between the two groups.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 65 patients were included, 58 males, median age of 82±7 years, 33 had wild type ATTR and 25 had hereditary ATTR. The SGLT2i group included 43 patients and the control group included 22 patients. The median follow-up (FUP) time was 16±13 months. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Despite the lack of statistical differences between groups on NYHA class at baseline or at the end of FUP, there is a tendency to a greater improvement in function class in the SGLT2 group where the 8 patients that were on NYHA III before starting SGLT2i improved to NYHA II or I; in the control group, 1 patient was at NYHA III at baseline and 3 patients were in NYHA III and 1 in NYHA IV at FUP – Table 1.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">At baseline both groups presented a similar NT-proBNP. However, during follow-up, patients treated with SGLT2i presented a higher level of NT-proBNP (SGLT2i: 1548±2564 pg/mL vs. control group: 793±1375 pg/mL, p=0.031) and needed diuretic uptitration (p=0.09). Despite these data suggesting that patients in the SGLT2i group had more severe disease, that may had led to SGLT2 initiation, in this group, only one patient had an admission for HF and in the control group 3 patients experienced at least one HF event leading to hospitalization.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">All patients were alive at FUP and, in the SGLT2i group only one patient had to stop the drug due to genitourinary recurrent infections. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with SGLT2i on top of tafamidis appears to be linked to an improvement in NYHA functional class and may have prognostic benefits in patients with ATTR-CM. Larger, well dimensioned studies are necessary to assess the definite impact on SGLT2i on HF admissions in this population.</span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site