Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
SAMY Score: A Discriminative Tool for Distinguishing Myocarditis from Acute Coronary Syndrome
Session:
Sessão de Posters 11 - Miocardite Aguda
Speaker:
Mariana Isabel Duarte Almeida
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.4 Myocardial Disease – Treatment
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Mariana Duarte Almeida; João Gouveia Fiuza; Gonçalo Ferreira; Vanda Devesa Neto; Luísa Gonçalves; Nuno Craveiro
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Background:</span></strong><span style="color:#000000; font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif; font-size:medium"> Distinguishing between myocarditis and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses challenges due to overlapping symptoms of chest pain and troponin elevation. The European Society of Cardiology recommends excluding coronary disease (greater or equal to 5</span><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">0% stenosis) in suspected myocarditis, but invasive angiography has a 1-2% complication risk. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a safer alternative, indicating myocarditis, and ruling out myocardial infarction. In the absence of accessible CMR, SAMY score, validated for myocarditis vs. ACS, aids physicians in decision-making. It considers age, C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, recent infection (<4 weeks), hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Methods:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> Retrospective data from June 2021 to May 2023 were collected for chest pain admissions in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit with elevated troponin levels suggestive of myocardial infarction and absence of significant coronary artery obstruction (MINOCA-diagnosed patients). Demographics, blood labs, CMR details and discharge diagnosis were gathered</span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:TimesNewRomanPSMT,serif">. </span></span><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">SAMY score was calculated for each patient and compared with CMR diagnosis. Independent t-test was used for SAMY score comparison between groups. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between PERFORM and outcomes. The score’s capacity to predict myocarditis diagnosis was analyzed using ROC curve and respective area under the curve (AUC).</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Results:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> A cohort of 58 patients, 67.2% being females, was analyzed. The mean age was 65.8 </span><span style="font-family:Symbol">±</span> <span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">15.9 years old. Of these patients, 56.9% underwent CMR (n=33), which suggested a myocarditis diagnosis in 54.5% (n=18) of the cases. Patients with a CMR-diagnosis of myocarditis had a higher SAMY score (3.5 </span><span style="font-family:Symbol">±</span><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> 2.7), compared with those without myocarditis (1.4 </span><span style="font-family:Symbol">±</span><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> 2.7), with a statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.032). This suggests that SAMY score can predict myocarditis diagnosis, yielding an odds ratio of 1.358 (p=0.042; 95% CI: 1.011-1.824). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted, resulting in an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.724 (p=0.029; 95% CI: 0.540-0.909), meaning a moderate discriminatory capacity.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Conclusions:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> The SAMY score is a practical tool in the emergency department, using six easily obtainable clinical variables for myocarditis and ACS differentiation. However, low SAMY score does not conclusively negate myocarditis, nor does a higher score definitively establish the diagnosis. Attending physicians should integrate clinical data, considering the SAMY score, while assessing risks and benefits associated with potential percutaneous coronary intervention for each patient. Future refinements in scoring systems hold the promise of tailoring invasive angiography interventions to those individuals who stand to derive the most benefit. </span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site