Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prevalence and Predictors of Normotensive Cardiogenic Shock in Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Session:
Sessão de Posters 02 - Embolia Pulmonar
Speaker:
Bárbara Lacerda Teixeira
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
Subtheme:
21.4 Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure - Treatment
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Bárbara Lacerda Teixeira; Sofia Jacinto; Miguel Antunes; André Grazina; Francisco Albuquerque; André Ferreira; Joao Reis; Ana Galrinho; Luis Almeida Morais; Ruben Ramos; Duarte Cacela; Rui Cruz Ferreira
Abstract
<p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Introduction</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and hypotension (high-risk PE) exhibit a notably elevated mortality rate. In intermediate-risk PE, cardiogenic shock may also manifest, but this subgroup is less extensively characterized. Patients with normotensive shock (NTS) display systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg but cardiac index ≤ 2.2 L/min/m2, and it is generally recognized that these patients may still face significant morbidity and mortality due to compromised cardiac function and inadequate perfusion to vital organs.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Objectives</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">To assess prevalence and predictors of NTS in intermediate-risk PE</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">A prospective registry of consecutive intermediate-high PE pts submitted to catheter directed therapies (CDT) in a single tertiary center was used. Clinical, biomarkers, echocardiographic, CT and right heart catheterization (RHC) data were collected at admission. Pts were divided according to having NTS or not. Comparison was assessed by chi-square, t-test and Mann-Whitney. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of NTS. After the identification of this variables, a composite score was made and assessed for its accuracy to identify NTS patients using ROC curve analysis.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">48 pts (45,8% women, mean age 57 ± 18) were included. 27,1% (n=13) were in NTS. Patients in NTS were more likely to have acute-on-chronic presentation (38,5% vs 8,6%, p = 0,014), higher lactate levels (1,7 vs 1,1, p = 0,011), lower venous saturation of oxygen (SvO2) (57 ± 7,7 vs 67 ± 6,8, p < 0,001), have saddle PE (53,8% vs 22,9%, p = 0,040), RV dysfunction on echocardiography (84,6% vs 52,9%, p = 0,046), higher NT-proBNP levels (3667 vs 1991, p = 0,036) and higher creatinine levels (1,4 vs 0,8, p = 0,010). A double approach in CDT (fibrinolysis + penumbra) was more common in patients with NTS (38,5% vs 5,7%, p = 0,014). Regarding NTS predictors, we identified 5 independent predictors: acute-on-chronic presentation (p = 0,005), lactate levels (p = 0,034), SvO2 (p = 0,013), saddle PE (p < 0,001) and creatinine levels (p = 0,017). Using a ROC curve analysis, AUC for lactate was 0.740 with a Sn of 61,5% and a Sp 66% for a cut-off of 1,55, for SvO2 was 0.836 with a Sn of 76,9% and Sp 82% for a cut-off of 61,9%, for creatinine was 0.745 with a Sn of 61,5% and Sp 80% for a cut-off of 1,1 mg/dL. After identify these cut-offs, a composite score was created, attributing 1 point for each predictor. A score ≥ 3 (from 0 to 5) demonstrated high accuracy to identify NTS patients, with an AUC 0,909, p < 0,001, a Sn 85% and Sp of 99%.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Conclusions</strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:start"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Despite being hemodynamically stable, 27% of patients classified as intermediate-high risk exhibited normotensive shock. Our findings indicate that acute-on-chronic presentation, lactate levels, SvO2, the presence of saddle pulmonary embolism, and creatinine levels were independent predictors of this condition. A score 3 ≥ effectively enhanced the risk stratification of these patients.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site