Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
PERFORM Score: A Prognostic Tool for Predicting Need for Fibrinolysis in Pulmonary Embolism
Session:
Sessão de Posters 02 - Embolia Pulmonar
Speaker:
Mariana Isabel Duarte Almeida
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
Subtheme:
21.4 Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure - Treatment
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Mariana Duarte Almeida; Gonçalo Ferreira; João Gouveia Fiuza; Vanda Devesa Neto; Inês Pires; Nuno Craveiro
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Background: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially lethal condition presenting to emergency departments, which requires precise risk stratification for timely intervention. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score is widely used for acute PE severity assessment. However, obtaining comprehensive information in the emergency setting, particularly regarding comorbidities like cancer and chronic pulmonary disease, can be challenging. Consequently, there is a need to evaluate streamlined scoring systems for rapid decision-making. The validated Pulmonary Embolism Risk score FOR Mortality (PERFORM) score, utilizing age, heart rate, and partial pressure of arterial oxygen, has been used to predict mortality in PE patients. This study aims not only to assess PERFORM’s capacity to predict mortality outcomes, but mainly to predict fibrinolysis requirement in PE-diagnosed patients.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Methods: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Retrospective data from 198 patients admitted due to intermediate or high-risk acute PE in a Cardiology Department were analyzed. Demographic information, admission clinical data, treatment choices, and mortality outcomes were examined. The PERFORM score was calculated for each patient. Independent t-test was used for group comparison. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between PERFORM and outcomes. The score's ability to predict fibrinolysis and mortality outcomes was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Results:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> In the analyzed cohort of 198 patients (59.1% females, mean age 63.1 ± 17.9 years), 50.5% underwent fibrinolysis, and 6.6% experienced in-hospital mortality. </span></span></span><span style="color:#000000">Patients that undergone fibrinolysis had a higher PERFORM score (6.0 ± 2.0), comparing with those submitted to a conservative approach (5.2 ± 2.2). The independent t-test indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.007). This suggests that PERFORM score can predicted need for fibrinolysis, yielding an odds ratio of 1.212 (p=0.009; 95% CI: 1.049-1.400). ROC analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.611 (p=0.009, 95%CI 0.528-0.694), indicating a moderate discriminatory capacity. However, the PERFORM score did not predict mortality (p=0.777; CI 95%: 0.376-0.671).</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:14px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">Conclusions: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif">In our population, PERFORM score lacked ability to predict mortality, but showed</span><span style="font-family:"Abadi MT Condensed Light",sans-serif"> some capacity to predict need for fibrinolysis, especially in settings that are information-constrained and time-sensitive. Nevertheless, both low and high PERFORM scores lack conclusive determination for the optimal therapeutic approach. Attending physicians should integrate clinical data, incorporating the PERFORM score, while carefully weighing risks and benefits associated with fibrinolysis. Prospective refinements in scoring systems hold promise for tailoring interventions to maximize benefits for individual patients.</span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site