Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Computed Tomography-derived myocardial extracellular volume as a prognosis predictor in patients with severe aortic stenosis
Session:
Sessão Melhores Comunicações Orais
Speaker:
Rita Reis Santos
Congress:
CPC 2024
Topic:
P. Other
Theme:
37. Miscellanea
Subtheme:
03.2 Computed Tomography
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Rita Reis Santos; Rita Carvalho; Pedro M. Lopes; Francisco Gama; Pedro Freitas; Sara Guerreiro; João Abecasis; Carla Saraiva; Rui Campante Teles; Manuel de Sousa Almeida; Pedro Adragão; António M. Ferreira
Abstract
<p style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Background:</strong></span></span></span> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) face a higher risk of mortality, but prognosis is still heterogeneous and tools for prioritizing intervention are needed. </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV), measured non-invasively in pre-TAVR computed tomography (CT), is a marker of fibrosis that may reflect the degree of irreversible damage. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of </span></span>CT-derived ECV (ECV<sub><span style="color:#222222">C</span>T</sub>) <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">in patients with severe AS referred for TAVR-planning CT.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods: </strong><span style="color:black">Consecutive patients with </span>severe symptomatic AS <span style="color:black">undergoing </span>TAVR-planning CT between April and December 2022 a<span style="color:black">t single centre were prospectively included. </span>CT was performed on a 192-slice dual-source 3<sup>rd</sup>generation scanner. ECV<sub><span style="color:#222222">C</span>T</sub> was acquired during TAVR-planning using an additional post-contrast low-radiation-dose prospective acquisition. ECV<sub>CT</sub> was calculated as the ratio of change in CT attenuation (Hounsfield units [HU]) of the septal myocardium and the left ventricle (LV) blood pool before and after contrast administration, according to the equation: ECV<sub>CT</sub> = (1 – hematocrit) x (<span style="font-family:Symbol">D</span>HU<sub>myo</sub>/<span style="font-family:Symbol">D</span>HU<sub>blood</sub>) – Figure 1A. </span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization.</span></span></span> </p> <p style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 patients were included (<span style="color:#222222">mean </span>age 81 ± 7 years; 46% male<span style="color:#222222">; mean transaortic </span>gradient 51 ± 15 mmHg<span style="color:#222222">; mean aortic valve </span>area 0.75 ± 0.19 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="color:#222222">; mean LV ejection fraction (EF) by 2D echocardiogram </span>57 ± 11%). No patient had a clinical diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Mean ECV<sub><span style="color:#222222">C</span>T </sub>was 33.9 ± 8.0%. <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">During a median follow-up period of 386 days (IQR 332 – 464), </span></span>there were 18 deaths (13%), 13 before intervention and 5 after intervention; the secondary endpoint occurred in 26 patients (19%), 17 of which before intervention and 9 after. Patients who attained the primary endpoint were significantly older [81 ± 7 vs. 85 ± 7 years, P = 0.011], had lower left ventricular ejection fraction [51 ± 11 vs. 58 ± 11%, P = 0.015], higher NTproBNP levels [4739 (IQR 2003 – 9970) vs. 751 (IQR 314 – 2541), P <0.001] and higher ECV values (39.9 ± 7.4% vs. 33.0 ± 7.7%, P <0.001). </span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">After adjustment for age, LVEF and NTproBNP levels, ECV<sub>CT</sub> remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.09 per 1% ECV increase, 95%CI 1.02 – 1.17, p=0.005 – Figure 1B) and also the secondary endpoint (adjusted HR 1.07 per 1% ECV increase, 95%CI 1.01 – 1.13, p=0.002).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="color:black">Conclusions: </span></strong>In this prospective observational cohort study, interstitial fibrosis assessed by CT-derived ECV was associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe AS. <span style="color:black">ECV</span><sub>CT </sub>values<sub> </sub>may be useful to identify a subgroup of patients with higher risk who may benefit from <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">earlier intervention.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site