Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Beta-blockers and antiplatelet therapy in Takotsubo Syndrome – To do or not to do?
Session:
Comunicações Orais - Sessão 26 - Doenças do Miocárdio
Speaker:
Pedro Rocha Carvalho
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.7 Myocardial Disease - Other
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Pedro Rocha Carvalho; Isabel Moreira; Marta Catarina Bernardo; Catarina Carvalho; Catarina Ferreira; Fernando Gonçalves; Pedro Magalhães; José Paulo Fontes; Ilídio Moreira
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">Introduction:</span></span></strong> <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">Sympathetic nerve stimulation and catecholamine storm are the main players in the pathogenesis of </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS), however, the impact of beta-blockers (BB) remains uncertain. Conversely, despite recent evidence suggesting a lack of benefit, antiplatelet therapy is still extensively prescribed in patients with TTS. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">Purpose:</span></span></strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black"> To study if BB and antiplatelet therapy use after discharge in patients with TTS are associated with lower long-term major cardiovascular events. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black"><strong><span style="background-color:white">Methods: </span></strong><span style="background-color:white">Retrospective study with patients discharged with the diagnosis of TTS in a single center from January/2013 to November/2022</span></span>. <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and TTS recurrence (MACCE). </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black"><strong><span style="background-color:white">Results: </span></strong><span style="background-color:white">A total of</span><strong> </strong></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212529">103 patients were included in this study (85,7% females; mean age 71±12 years old), 84,8% presenting with chest pain and 41,2% presenting with ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. During hospitalization, 37 had heart failure, 9 had a cardiogenic shock, 4 had left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, 7 patients needed ionotropic support, 14 needed mechanical ventilation and 4 died.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212529">Compared with the other without BB, patients discharged on BB (69,9%) had similar age (69,0±12 vs 73±12 years, p=0,093), cardiovascular risk factors, ST-segment elevation at admission (36,6% vs 53,8%, p=0,14), pro-BNP levels at admission [2800</span></span> <span style="color:black">[IQR 741;6039 </span>mg/dl] vs 3996 [IQR <span style="color:black">1224;10031 </span>mg/dl], p = 0,23] and peak T troponin (0,4 IQR <span style="color:black">[0,22;0,70]</span>) vs 0,54 IQR <span style="color:black">[0,30;1,5]</span>),p=0,10. There was no difference in left ventricular ejection fraction on admission (39,5% vs 39%, p= 0,74) and at discharge (54% vs 54 %, p=0,85). However, there was a higher percentage of men in the group of patients without BB therapy (8,3% vs 30,8%, p=0,005).</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Antithrombotic therapy given during hospitalization and on discharge was similar in patients with and without beta-blocker prescription.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">During a median follow-up of 41 months [14;59<span style="font-size:12.0pt">],</span> 24 patients (27,3%) <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">experienced a MACCE event</span></span>. <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">On adjusted Cox regression analysis, patients under BB therapy showed a significantly lower risk for MACCE events (adjusted HR: 0.338; 95% CI: 0.135 to 0.849), however, this was not true for antiplatelet therapy (HR: 0.733; 95% CI: 0.315 to 0.1,704, p=0,477).</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black"><strong><span style="background-color:white">Conclusion:</span></strong> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">In this study, patients </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212529">discharged on beta-blockers had a significant risk reduction of </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, stroke or takotsubo syndrome recurrence. </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212529">A</span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">ntiplatelet therapy, however, failed to show a similar risk reduction benefit.</span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site