Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Pharmacologic transition in the care of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - a real life analysis
Session:
Posters (Sessão 5 - Écran 2) - Insuficiência cardíaca - tratamento farmacológico
Speaker:
Isabel Cruz
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
D. Heart Failure
Theme:
10. Chronic Heart Failure
Subtheme:
10.4 Chronic Heart Failure – Treatment
Session Type:
Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Isabel Cruz; Inês Campos; Bruno Bragança; Rafaela Lopes; Inês Oliveira; Joel Monteiro; Rui Pontes Dos Santos; Aurora Andrade
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>1. Introduction</strong></span></span><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems is crucial in the management of patients (pts) with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Additionally, the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has become an additional weapon to reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death and worsening HF in this group of pts.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">2. Purpose</span></span></strong><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Evaluate pts with HFrEF concerning the use of neurohormonal antagonist (NHA) therapy and SGLT2i therapy, to identify the effects of these drugs on major CV endpoints in a real-life setting. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>3. Methods</strong></span></span><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Unicentric, retrospective analysis of pts followed from 2011 to 2019 due to HFrEF (ejection fraction<40%). Pts were evaluated regarding the prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), beta-blockers (BB) and SGLT2i. The endpoints were: composite of all-cause mortality and HFhosp; all-cause mortality; CV mortality; HFhosp. Pearson´s Chi2 tests and binary logistic regressions were performed. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><strong>4. Results</strong></span></span><br /> <span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif; font-size:11pt">A total of 400 pts were included (72.8% male, mean age 60.5±13.0 years). 69.3% pts were prescribed with ACEi/ARB, 16.5% pts with ARNi, 90.3% with BB, 53.3% with MRA and 6.5% with SGLT2i. During follow-up there was a mortality rate of 24.0% (61.5% due to CV causes) and a rate of HFhosp of 20.0%. The prescription of ARNi was related with fewer composite events (3.5% vs 30.8%, p=.015), CV mortality (0.3% vs 14.5%, p<.001) and all-cause mortality (0.3% vs 23.8%, p<.001). MRA (10.5% vs 13.5%, p=.032) and SGLT2i (0.3% vs 23.8%, p=.013) were associated with lower all-cause mortality.</span><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Binary logistic regression isolated use of ACEi/ARB and ARNi was the drugs associated with fewer outcomes. Specifically, ACEi/ARB and ARNi were associated with fewer composite events (p<.001, OR 0.261, 95% CI 0.138-0.496 and p<.001, OR 0.137, 95% CI 0.058-0.325, respectively); lower all-cause mortality (p<.001, OR 0.243, 95% CI 0.129-0.460 and p<.001, OR 0.013, 95% CI 0.002-0.104, respectively); CV mortality (p=.002, OR 0.331, 95% CI 0.165-0.662 and p=.001, OR 0.032, 95% CI 0.004-0.252, respectively); HFhops (p<.001, OR 0.250, 95% CI 0.127-0.492 and p=.007, OR 0.303, 95% CI 0.127-0.723, respectively). </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black"><strong>5. Conclusion</strong></span></span></span></span><br /> <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">This cohort illustrates the prognostic improvement of the transition into the most recent pharmacological classes of HF management. The prescription of ACEi/ARB and ARNi were associated with fewer CV events. Moreover, the logistic regression revealed that ARNi prescription presented a higher effect size than ACEi/ARB regarding CV mortality. This reinforces the great benefit of this drugs in reducing major CV events in pts with HFrEF. </span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site