Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Assessment of Myocardial Work in sarcomere gene mutation carriers and overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Session:
Comunicações Orais - Sessão 21 - Miocardiopatia hipertrófica
Speaker:
Carla Marques Pires
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.7 Myocardial Disease - Other
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Carla Marques Pires; Miltiadis Triantafyllou; Ricardo Prista Monteiro; George Joy; Ana Ferreira; Konstantinos Savvatis; Luís da Rocha Lopes
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Introduction</span></span></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common genetic heart disease defined by unexplained hypertrophy and often characterized by diastolic and systolic dysfunction. In recent studies, </span></span><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">HCM patients were found to have impaired </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MW), a more load-independent parameter compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS). MW was never studied in sarcomere mutation carriers.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Aim</span></span></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">To compare MW between sarcomere mutation carriers, healthy controls and overt HCM.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Methods</span></span></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">A single centre study with a case-control design. The study population comprised 3 groups: overt HCM patients with a likely pathogenic/pathogenic sarcomere gene variant (n=51), carriers (n=51) and age and sex matched (to the carriers) healthy controls (n=32). All participants (pts) underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram including myocardial deformation analysis to calculate global longitudinal strain (GLS) and MW. MW was calculated from same-day non-invasive blood pressure evaluation. Global work index (GWI), Global constructive work (GCW), Global work efficiency (GWE) and Global wasted work (GWW) were obtained.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Results </span></span></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">GWI (1695mmHg% vs 1869mmHg%, p=0.001) and GCW (1993mmHg% vs 2244mmHg%, p<0.001) were lower in sarcomere mutation carriers compared to controls. LVEF and GLS were similar between the two groups (p=0.233). HCM pts were older (p<0.001), less likely female (p=0.01) and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular (Cv) comorbidities, including hypertension (p<0.001), compared with sarcomere gene mutation carriers. Global work index (GWI) (1209mmHg%vs1695mmHg%), global constructive work (1456mmHg% vs 1993mmHg%, p<0.001) and global work efficiency (GWE) (89% vs 95%, p<0.001) were significantly lower in overt HCM compared with sarcomere mutation carriers. GWW was higher (117mmHg% vs 95mmHg%, p=0.006) in overt HCM.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Conclusion</span></span></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">In this study, we show for the first time that MW indexes were significantly worse in sarcomere gene mutation carriers compared to controls. GLS and MW indexes were also significantly different between overt HCM and sarcomere gene mutation carriers. </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">These data </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">suggest that MW is more sensitive to early changes than GLS and could play a major role in the evaluation and follow-up of </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">sarcomere mutation carriers. </span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site