Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Performance of the MAGGIC score in predicting all-cause death and cardiovascular events in coronary heart disease patients
Session:
Posters (Sessão 4 - Écran 2) - Insuficiência cardíaca - estratificação de risco
Speaker:
Bruno Bragança
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
D. Heart Failure
Theme:
10. Chronic Heart Failure
Subtheme:
10.2 Chronic Heart Failure – Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Session Type:
Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Bruno Bragança; Rafaela G. Lopes; Inês G. Campos; Inês Oliveira; Isabel Cruz; Inês G. Campos; Joel P. Monteiro; Conceição Queirós; Paulo Pinto; Aurora Andrade
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Background:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> Risk stratification in Chronic Heart failure (CHF) has provided valuable refinement in identifying patients who will benefit most from high levels of care and advanced therapies. The MAGGIC score has been demonstrated to be superior to other validated scores in predicting survival in symptomatic CHF (ACC/AHA stage C and D)<sup>1</sup>. However, its value in earlier stages of CHF remains unknown; thus, we aim at exploring the prognostic impact of MAGGIC score in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Methods: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">We included data prospectively collected from 568 patients with CHD. The MAGGIC score is a weighted scoring model that combines 13 different clinical variables, with a score range from low-risk 0 to high-risk 61 points<sup>2</sup>. The MAGGIC score was calculated at the beginning of the study between 2009-2010. Patients were retrospectively followed up to 12/2022 for the occurrence of death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke. Patients with reported symptomatic HF at baseline were excluded. Logistic and Cox regression models were used in time-to-event analysis. NYHA functional class was derived from the metabolic equivalent of tasks. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Results:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> At baseline, mean age 59±10 years, 88% male, 74% dyslipidemia, 64% hypertension, 31% diabetes, BMI 29±4 kg/m2, 15% chronic kidney disease, 45% were active or former smokers, 4% stroke, 76% myocardial infarction and 98% had preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Regarding medication, more than 75% were treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, statins and anti-platelets. During follow-up (9.9±2.8 years), 38.6% (n=219 patients) met the composite endpoint of MACE, 21.8% had symptomatic CHF and 16.0% myocardial infarction. The mortality rate was 14.8% (n=84), with 4.5% cardiovascular deaths (n=25). The MAGGIC score follows a normal distribution with mean 13.7± 5.4 (2-33, min-max). MAGGIC positively correlated with brain natriuretic peptide levels (p<0.007). For each 10-point increase in score, adjusted ORs increase 3.4-fold for death (CI 2.3-4.9, p<0.0001), 1.5-fold for MACE (CI 1.13-2.01, p=0.005), and 1.4-fold for the onset of symptomatic CHF (CI 1.01-1.88, p=0.043). In survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves were significantly separated across MAGGIC score (p<0.0001), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.69 for discrimination of patients at higher risk of death. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Conclusion:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> MAGGIC score is a powerful predictor of adverse events in CAD patients. MAGGIC score might be potentially helpful in identifying high-risk patients in earlier stages of CHF (ACC/AHA stage B) that benefit from intensification of clinical monitoring and aggressive control of cardiovascular risk factors. </span></span></span></p> <ol> <li style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(6):452-462. 2- Eur Heart J. 2012;33(14):1750-7. </span></span></span></span></span></li> </ol>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site