Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Predictors of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy at Long-term Follow-up After Effective Stent Implantation For Aortic Coarctation
Session:
Posters (Sessão 3 - Écran 7) - Intervenção em cardiopatias congénitas
Speaker:
Isabel Sampaio Graca
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
Subtheme:
20.4 Congenital Heart Disease – Treatment
Session Type:
Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Isabel Sampaio Graça; João Rato; Maria Ana Estevens; Miguel Mata; Susana Cordeiro; Mafalda Sequeira; Rui Anjos
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Background and Aim:</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black"> Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined echocardiographically as an increased LV mass index (LVMI), is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, as well as a marker for arterial hypertension-mediated organ damage. We evaluated LV mass at long-term follow up of effectively stented aortic coarctation patients, assessing possible targets to decrease this risk factor.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Methods:</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black"> Study population included 86 patients with aortic coarctation and no significant aortic valve disease, who had undergone stent implantation, with a follow up of 2 to 24 years (mean 11.5 years). Evaluation included clinical data, transthoracic echocardiogram, office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour BP monitoring. LV mass was measured echocardiographically as per published guidelines and indexed to body surface area. Simple linear regression was used to assess correlations for LV mass. Significant variables were used to build a multivariable model.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Results:</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black"> At the time of stenting, 59 patients (69%) had native coarctation; mean age was 29 years (SD 15.5); 42% had bicuspid aortic valve. </span></span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Invasive aortic gradient decreased from mean 42.3mmHg (SD 21.2) to 4.7mmHg (SD 6.5) immediately after stenting. There were no major complications.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">At last follow-up: mean age was 40.5 (SD </span></span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">15.5</span></span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">) and 12% were over 60 years old; all patients had an </span></span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">echocardiographic isthmic gradient of less than 20mmHg, mean 12.2mmHg (SD 4.8). Fifty-two (60%) patients were on anti-hypertensive medication. Mean systolic office BP was 132mmHg (SD 11.1); and at 24-hour monitoring was 125mmHg (SD 17.9). Mean LVMI decreased from 129.7g/m<sup>2</sup> (SD 53.6) at time of stenting, to</span></span></span> <span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">105.6g/m<sup>2</sup> (SD 31.9) at last follow-up and 36% had criteria for LVH. </span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">The</span></span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black"> multivariable regression model predicted high LVMI using age at first stenting procedure (p<0.001), mean systolic BP at 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring (p=0.005) and male gender (p=0.007).</span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Conclusions:</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black"> Despite an effective stenting procedure, patients with aortic coarctation may still have elevated LVMI at long-term follow up. Early identification and treatment of the disease is key to reduce this burden, while 24-hour BP monitoring is the single best exam to predict LVMI, and should be used to guide treatment.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site