Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
The predictive role of right and left ventricular longitudinal strain measured by two-dimensional echocardiography in wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis
Session:
Posters (Sessão 2 - Écran 5) - Doenças do miocárdio
Speaker:
Tamara Pereira
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.7 Myocardial Disease - Other
Session Type:
Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Tamara Pereira; Mariana Tinoco; Margarida Castro; Luísa Pinheiro; Margarida Oliveira; Olga Azevedo; Francisco Ferreira; António Lourenço
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:blue"><u><strong> </strong></u></span><br /> <strong><span style="color:#333333">Background</span></strong><span style="color:#333333">: Wild-type transthyretin </span><span style="color:#2e2e2e">amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) </span>is a biventricular disease. The prognostic implications of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are well defined. However, there are only few studies assessing the association between right ventricular (RV) systolic function and outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of right and left ventricular longitudinal deformation in <span style="color:#2e2e2e">wild-type transthyretin ATTR-CM </span>patients.<br /> <br /> <span style="color:#333333"><strong>Methods:</strong> </span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212529">This is a retrospective single-center study including all patients with diagnosis </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">of wild-type ATTR-CM </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212529">between January </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:black">2014 and August 2021. ATTR-CM diagnosis was based on the AHA diagnostic criteria. </span></span> <span style="color:black">The primary </span>endpoint was the composite endpoint of hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) or death for any cause. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared between patients reaching and not reaching the primary endpoint. RV strain analysis was obtained from the free wall of the RV based on the RV-focused apical 4- chamber view. The use of -13% as a prognostic cut-off value of RV free wall strain was supported by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of the primary endpoint.<br /> <br /> <strong><span style="color:black">Results:</span></strong><span style="color:black"> 60 patients with wild-type </span><span style="color:#2e2e2e">ATTR-CM were included. The </span><span style="color:black">median age was 87 [69; 97]. 68.3% of patients were male and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 52 ± 14%. </span><span style="color:black">The median follow-up</span> was 40 [1; 107] months. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">During follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 34 patients (56.7%); 22 patients died within 2.5 years of their diagnosis, 10 of them by cardiovascular cause.<strong><u> </u></strong><br /> <br /> Patients reaching the primary endpoint<strong><u> </u></strong><br /> <span style="color:black">had a lower </span>mean LVEF (48±13% vs 58±12%, p=0.003) and <span style="color:black">mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) (</span>-9±2% vs 14±2%, p<0.001). The fractional area change (FAC) was lower (31±9% vs 36±8%, p=0.031) and RV free wall strain was significantly worse (-9±2 vs -16 ±5, p<0.001).</span></span><br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Kaplan-Meier curves showed that primary endpoint-free survival was lower in</span> <span style="color:black">patients with reduced LVEF </span>(31±6 vs 71±9 months, p=0.004), GLS < -12% (22±4 vs 87±8 months, p<0.001), FAC < 35% (34 ± 6% vs 68 ± 9%, p=0.024) and RV free wall strain <-13%<span style="color:black"> (23±3 vs 101±6 months, p<0.001). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">In Cox regression analysis, reduced LV GLS and RV free wall strain remained independent predictors of the primary endpoint (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.646–0.991, p=0.041;<br /> HR 0.83 95% CI 0.698–0.987, p=0.035, respectively).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="color:black">Conclusions:</span></strong><span style="color:black"> Reduced LV GLS and RV free wall strain are independent predictors of the occurrence of the primary endpoint of hospitalization due to HF or death of any cause in </span><span style="color:#2e2e2e">wild-type ATTR-CM </span>patients. </span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site