Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
A tale of a deadly duo – Estimating prognosis in CTD associated PH
Session:
Comunicações Orais - Sessão 10 - Hipertensão Pulmonar Tromboembólica Crónica
Speaker:
Pedro Alves Da Silva
Congress:
CPC 2023
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
Subtheme:
21.7 Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure - Other
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Pedro Alves Da Silva; Joana Brito; Beatriz Silva; Ana Margarida Martins; Catarina Simões Oliveira; Ana Beatriz Garcia; Ana Abrantes; Miguel Raposo; Catarina Gregório; João Fonseca; Tatiana Guimarães; Nuno Lousada; Rui Plácido; Fausto J. Pinto
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Introduction</strong>: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe complication of connective tissue disease (CTD), conveying a poor prognosis in this population. PAH specific therapies improved the outcome for PAH patients in the modern treatment era, but few data are available regarding risk stratification and prognosis in this specific pts. Pulmonary vascular compliance is diminished due to decreased proximal pulmonary arterial elasticity and increased distal pulmonary arterial vasculopathy<span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">. </span></span></span>A recent paper proposed that pulmonary artery compliance (PAC) could be a marker of prognosis in Chinese patients with LES and PH, but its application in other CTD is yet to be confirmed. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Purpose</strong>: We aimed to identify factors that could influence mortality in this subset of pts and to determine if PAC could act as a valid predictor in pts with CTD other than LES.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Methods</strong>: Observational single centre retrospective study including pts followed in a reference hospital for PH related to CTD. Clinical, lab, echo and RHC data were collected at beginning and during FUP. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed with Cox regression and survival analysis was done using Kaplan Meyer curves. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Results</strong>: 48 patients with CTD and associated PH were gathered, mean age was 65,25 ± 14,4 years and female per male ratio 10:1 (9% male). Systemic sclerosis was the most prevalent CTD (52,1%), followed by LES and Sjögren sydrome. During a mean FUP of 5 years, 39,6% pts died (n=39) and 43,8% were hospitalized (n=21) due to CV cause. There were no statistical differences between different CTD aetiologies in respect to mortality and admissions. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">On univariate Cox analysis, NTproBNP (p<0,001), alkaline phosphatase (p=0,001); uric acid (p=0,014), TAPSE/sPAP ratio (p=0,015) and COMPERA at beginning FUP (p<0,001) correlated with CV events (composite endpoint of admissions and mortality). TAPSE/sPAP ratio<0,55 has been described as a non-invasive marker of severity in PAH. After ROC curve analysis, TAPSE/sPAP ratio<0,379 had the best specificity and sensitivity in our population.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Pulmonary vasculature is a highly compliant system but pts with PAH have a lower PAC. PAC can be estimated by a simplified calculus, dividing stroke volume per pulse pressure. A cut-off of lower than 1,39mL/mmHg had been proposed as conveying worse prognosis and we thus divided our population using this value. In our cohort 40 pts had all the parameters at RHC that enabled calculation of PAC: 20 above and 20 below 1,39mLmmHg . Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a significant difference between two groups (p=0,001, 95% CI 6,82-11,1).</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong>Conclusion</strong>: In this specific population NTproBNP, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid and COMPERA at beggining were predictors of CV events. In line with proposed pathophysiology, PAC showed to be a marker of severity and a previously proposed cut-off of 1,39mL/mmHg revealed a positive association with prognosis not only in LES but in other CTD.</span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site