SPC365

Value of cardiopulmonary exercise test submaximal parameters in the assessment of aortic stenosis patients

Session: Posters (Sessão 5 - Écran 5) - Exercício e Reabilitação Cardíaca 2
Speaker: Rita Reis Santos

Congress: CPC 2022
Topic: J. Preventive Cardiology
Theme: 29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
Subtheme: 29.1 Exercise Testing
Session Type: Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number: ---
Authors: Rita Reis Santos; Mariana Paiva; Daniel a. Gomes; João Presume; Maria João Andrade; Luís Raposo; Anaí Durazzo; Luís Moreno; Miguel Mendes

<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt">BACKGROUND: </span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt">Exercise test is recommended for risk stratification of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), although a significant number of patients can&rsquo;t perform a maximal exercise test, increasing the potential value of sub-maximal parameters for the assessment of these patients. </span></span></span></span></p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt">AIM:</span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt"> To assess which parameters could be useful for risk stratification in case of a submaximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) in asymptomatic patients with severe AS. </span></span></span></span></p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">METHODS: </span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Retrospective evaluation of adult patients with asymptomatic severe AS, in a single center, who underwent CPET between December 2016 and November 2021. All patients underwent a treadmill CPET using an exercise protocol with progressive increase in workload. Patients were divided in group A (maximal CPET) or group B, respectively, if respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was &gt; 1.10 at peak exercise or below this value. Known parameters accessed in a submaximal CPET were evaluated: mean minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope (VE/VCO2), VO2 value in first ventilatory threshold (VT1), peak circulatory power, and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES).</span></span></span></span></span></p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">RESULTS: </span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">CPET was performed in 25 patients with severe asymptomatic AS (80 years &plusmn; 7 years, 56% male), median AVA was 0.86cm<sup>2</sup>&nbsp;[IQR 0.65 &ndash; 0.95 cm<sup>2</sup>] and </span></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:&quot;P‚÷??\7f &quot;">transaortic pressure gradient</span></span><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> was 46 mmHg [IQR 41-55 mmHg]. The most used protocol was a ramp slope. Nineteen patients (76%) didn&acute;t reach a RER&gt;1.10 (group B) due to respiratory (26%) or peripheral limitation (53%). Comparing both groups, group B patients showed a shorter duration of exercise of (8&plusmn;3 min vs. 9&plusmn;4 min, p=0.422), and a lowest mean peak VO2 (16.3 &plusmn; 3.6 vs. 20.5 &plusmn; 6.9 ml/kg/min, p=0.207). <span style="color:#211e1e">In our population, bivariate analyses demonstrated that OUES was the only submaximal parameter that could discriminate both groups: Group B patients had the lowest values (1.53 [IQR 1.47-1.70] vs. 1.94 [IQR 1.56 &ndash; 2.11], p=0.042). </span><span style="color:black">ROC curve analysis of OUES values revealed an AUC of 0.78 (p = 0.042) for maximal CPET prediction. The cut-off point with most sensitivity (S) and specificity (E) obtained using the Youden index (0.62) was 1.9 (S &asymp; 67%; E &asymp; 95%) (Figure 1).</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="color:black">CONCLUSIONS</span></span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="color:black">: In our cohort of asymptomatic AS patients, even with submaximal CPET, OUES accurately identify patients with higher degrees of functional limitation. Whether OUES is useful as prognostic marker to the workflow treatment of AS it&rsquo;s worth to be assessed prospectively.</span></span></span></span></span></p>