Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Emergent coronary angiography in a 90-plus population – outcomes at 5-years follow-up
Session:
Posters (Sessão 2 - Écran 1) - DAC e Cuidados Intensivos 2 - Tronco comum e Idade
Speaker:
Ricardo Alves Pinto
Congress:
CPC 2022
Topic:
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
Theme:
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
Subtheme:
13.4 Acute Coronary Syndromes – Treatment
Session Type:
Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Ricardo Alves Pinto; Tânia Proença; Miguel Martins Carvalho; Ana Filipa Amador; Catarina Costa; João Calvão; André Cabrita; Catarina Marques; Ana Pinho; Luis Santos; Cátia Priscila; Paula Dias; Filipe Macedo
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Introduction:</span></strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"> Elderly people represents a vulnerable and increasing population presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Several data suggest the benefit of an early revascularization in ST-elevation (STE)-ACS or non-STE-ACS with positive troponin. However questions persist considering the unavoidable adverse prognosis, patient’s functional and cognitive status, comorbidities and preferences. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Purpose: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">To evaluate a group of very old patients who underwent emergent coronary angiography (CA). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Methods: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">We retrospectively analyzed a group of very old patients (≥ 90 year-old) who underwent emergent CA from January 2008 to September 2020. Clinical features were collected; survival and MACE were compared with an aged-matched control population with ACS not submitted to emergent CA. MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, ACS and hospitalization for acute heart failure.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Results: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">A total of 34 patients were enrolled: 56% female, with mean age 92 </span><span style="font-family:Symbol">±</span><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"> 2 year-old. As for the cardiovascular risk factors, 88% had hypertension, 49% dyslipidaemia, 12% diabetes and 15% were previous smokers. Concerning other comorbidities, 27% had atrial fibrillation, 21% chronic kidney disease, 12% had cerebrovascular disease and median modified Rankin scale for neurologic disability was 2. Almost all patients had STE-ACS, 68% anterior and 29% inferior, inferolateral or inferoposterior infarction; 3% had infarction of indeterminate location. In CA, 65% had multivessel disease, 14% of them involving left main coronary artery; coronary intervention was performed in 71% of patients (mostly stent implantation), the remaining 29% had no invasive treatment. Concerning to clinical status, median troponin was 131 517 ng/L and median BNP 496 pg/mL; 36% of patients evolved in Killip class III or IV and only 32% of patients had normal left ventricular systolic function. Regarding mortality, 38% of patients died in the index-event versus 25% in the </span><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">aged-matched </span><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">control group (p=0.319). During five years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (Log Rank, p=0.403) and more than 50% of patients died in two years. Comparing MACE occurrence, both groups were similar (Log Rank, p=0,662), with more than 80% having at least one event in five years. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Conclusions: </span></strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Very old patients submitted to emergent CA had a high percentage of multivessel disease, left ventricular dysfunction and mortality during hospitalization. Compared to an </span><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">aged-matched control group, they showed no survival or MACE benefit of emergent CA strategy during a five-years follow-up. </span><span style="font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Although this is a small study, these findings highlight the efforts that should be made to optimize care in this vulnerable population, under-represented in the clinical trials. Special caution should be given to avoid possible unnecessary discomfort in this setting. </span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site