Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of worsening mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valve repair
Session:
Posters (Sessão 1 - Écran 8) - Doença Valvular 1 - Vários
Speaker:
Catarina Oliveira
Congress:
CPC 2022
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
15. Valvular Heart Disease
Subtheme:
15.4 Valvular Heart Disease – Treatment
Session Type:
Pósters Electrónicos
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Catarina Simões de Oliveira; Pedro Silvério António; Sara Couto Pereira; Pedro Alves da Silva; Joana Brito; Beatriz Valente Silva; Ana Margarida Martins; Ana Beatriz Garcia; Catarina Gregório; João Santos Fonseca; Miguel Nobre Menezes; Cláudia Jorge; João Silva Marques; Fausto j. Pinto; Pedro Cardoso
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Introduction: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Percutaneous mitral valve repair is an option for patients (pts) with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) that are not good surgical candidates. Since mitral edge-to-edge repair improves MR severity, pts usually report symptomatic and functional improvement. However, there is a trend towards worsening MR overtime after repair. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Purpose:</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"> Evaluate predictors of recurrence and worsening MR after percutaneous mitral valve repair in a real-world population.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Single-center record registry of consecutive pts submitted to percutaneous MR repair with MitraClip</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong> </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">from 2013 to October 2021. Demographic, clinical and echo variables were obtained before and after the procedure and during follow up (FUP). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Sixty three procedures were included (mean age 73.5±12 years, 60.3% males). Most pts had secondary grade 3 and 4 MR (38 pts, 60.3%), predominantly with Carpentier type 3b MR (33, 52.4%); 35 pts were in NYHA class III and 14 in class IV. At baseline TTE, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 40.5±17%, LV end diastolic volume 147±107mL, LV end systolic volume 96±88mL, mean vena contracta 7.3±1.7 mm, mean regurgitant volume 75±37 mL, mean EROA 0.67±1.3 cm</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><sup>2</sup></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">, LV global longitudinal strain -10.4±-4%, RV 4 chambers (C) strain -15.2±-6.5, RV free wall (FW) strain -16.2±7, TAPSE 19.4±10 mm and PSAP 50.5±17.4 mmHg. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">Procedure success was achieved in 95.2%, with a complication rate of 6.3% (4 pts: procedure failure in 2; 1 vascular complication and 1 stroke). During FUP, 19 pts died (8 from cardiovascular causes). Success of the procedure with acute improvement of MR occurred in 59 pts (≥2 grades to no regurgitation or mild in 36 pts). After a mean FUP of 13±14.7 months, 32 pts had TTE to evaluate MR: 12 did not worsen MR, 15 worsened MR by 1 point and 5 pts by 2 points. We observed significant improvement of NYHA class in the short term (3.0±0.7 vs 2±0.7, p=0.001). After a mean FUP of 34.6±25.3 months pts maintained symptomatic improvement (2±0.7 vs 1.9±0.5, p=0.366). Lower baseline RV strain (4C and FW) and TAPSE were predictors of MR worsening to the same grade before the procedure (p=0.011, p=0.027, p=0.005 respectively). We didn’t find other TTE or clinical predictors of MR worsening in FUP. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Conclusions: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">RV function evaluated with strain and TAPSE before MitraClip were the only predictors of worsening MR at long term FUP. However, our data suggest that clinical improvement may be seen, regardless of MR progression after edge-to-edge repair. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site