Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Regional impairment of left ventricular longitudinal strain in aortic regurgitation – have we found the missing piece?
Session:
Comunicações Orais (Sessão 27) - Imagem 2 - Ecocardiografia e Strain
Speaker:
Joana Silva Ferreira
Congress:
CPC 2022
Topic:
B. Imaging
Theme:
03. Imaging
Subtheme:
03.1 Echocardiography
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Joana Silva Ferreira; Liliana Marta; João Presume; Pedro Freitas; Sara Guerreiro; João Abecasis; Carla Reis; Eduarda Horta; Regina Ribeiras; Miguel Mendes; Maria João Andrade
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="color:black">Background</span></strong><span style="color:black">: Aortic regurgitation (AR) has been shown to have an impact on myocardial mechanics and recent studies have proved the value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) as an additional parameter in the assessment of disease severity and prognosis. However, a direct and localized influence of the regurgitant jet (RJ) on regional deformation has not yet been demonstrated.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="color:black">Purpose</span></strong><span style="color:black">: To assess if there is a regional pattern of impairment of longitudinal strain (LS) in AR connected to the direction of the RJ, as well as its potential reversibility and prognostic impact.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="color:black">Methods</span></strong><span style="color:black">: We studied patients (pts) with chronic moderate and severe isolated AR referred for echocardiographic evaluation. </span><span style="color:black">For each patient, we established the direction of the RJ according to the myocardial segments impacted by its turbulent portion</span><span style="color:black">. Pts were considered to have a jet-related LS reduction (JRSR) when the wall segments impacted by the jet had a relative reduction in LS of at least 30% </span><span style="color:black">compared to non-affected segments</span><span style="color:black">. Parameters of AR severity and left ventricular (LV) size and function were also assessed. For those who underwent surgical correction of AR, the postop TTE was also compared with the preop.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="color:black">Results</span></strong><span style="color:black">: Of the 203 AR pts screened, 80 met inclusion criteria (median age 57 years, 83% male). Mean GLS and ejection fraction (EF) were -16% and 54%, respectively. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">In 34 of the 80 pts, there was a regional reduction of 10 percentage points in the absolute value of LS in the segments impacted by the jet, compared to non-affected segments (median of -8% <em>vs</em> -18%, p<0.001), corresponding to a 56% relative decrease. </span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">The predominant jet directions were basal septum (44%), mid posterior and lateral</span> <span style="color:black">(24%), and basal inferior (12%). </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Demographics, severity of AR and parameters of systolic and diastolic function did not significantly differ between those who had JRSR or not. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Of the 34 pts with JRSR, 20 underwent corrective surgery. In an early postop TTE, the difference in LS between the segments impacted by the jet and the non-affected segments attenuated (4.7% absolute difference <em>vs</em> 10% in the preop TTE, p=0.001).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Pts with JRSR in the preop echo had lower rates of improvement of GLS (11 <em>vs</em> 46% of pts improved at least 2.5%, p=0.043) and a tendency towards lower rates of recovery of EF after surgery (17% <em>vs</em> 46% recovered at least 5% in EF, p=0.07).</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="color:black">Conclusion</span></strong><span style="color:black">: This study identifies an association between the parietal impact of the RJ in AR and regional LS impairment.</span> It suggests that external factors such as blood flow dynamics affect myocardial deformation. <span style="color:black">Additionally, the longstanding impact of the jet might damage the myocardium </span>to the point of limiting recovery of systolic function after corrective surgery.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="color:black">This is, to our knowledge, the first reported case series showing the negative effect of the jet’s impact on LV longitudinal function and, most importantly, on postop outcomes. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm its prognostic role.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site