Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prognosis significance of reaching optimal medical therapy in patients with heart failure- a real life overview
Session:
Posters - D. Heart Failure
Speaker:
José João Monteiro
Congress:
CPC 2021
Topic:
D. Heart Failure
Theme:
10. Chronic Heart Failure
Subtheme:
10.4 Chronic Heart Failure – Treatment
Session Type:
Posters
FP Number:
---
Authors:
José João Monteiro; Pedro Rocha Carvalho; Fernando Fonseca Gonçalves; José João Cardoso Dias Monteiro; Sara Borges; Jose Pedro Guimaraes; Miguel Moz; Marta Bernardo; Catarina Ribeiro Carvalho; Helder Ribeiro; Ilidio Moreira; Joaquim Manuel Chemba
Abstract
<p><strong><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Introduction</span></span></span></strong></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Heart failure remains a condition with an ominous prognosis, in spite of a growing number therapeutic options. So, it is important to elucidate which drugs and respective doses can impact survival outcomes.</span></span></span></p> <p><strong><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Objective</span></span></span></strong></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">To study benefit of reaching optimal medical therapy in real life heart failure cohort patients.</span></span></span></p> <p><strong><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Methods</span></span></span></strong></p> <p><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="color:#000000">Consecutive patients with heart failure diagnosis, ejection fraction <50% and regular follow-up for at least 12 months in a heart failure unit (n=262, mean follow-up of 485,3 ± 184,6 days) were included. Patients with optimal medical therapy (OMT) were compared with patients without OMT.</span></span></span></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">OMT was defined as at least 50% of target doses of all of three principal prognostic modifying drugs in heart failure (mineralocorticoid antagonists; aldosterone conversion enzyme inhibitor/aldosterone receptor antagonist; beta-blocker). </span></span></span></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Primary end-point was defined as death and secondary endpoint was a combined hospitalization or an emergency unscheduled visit due to heart failure (MACE). </span></span></span></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Between patients that did not reach OMT were made a subgroup stratification with patients under at least 50% of target doses of only one drug class or only two drug classes and compared survival outcomes between them.</span></span></span></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">To estimate trends in survival curves of each group was used Kaplan-Meier test and Chi Square test to compare secondary endpoint between groups.</span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="color:#000000"> Groups basal characteristics and comorbidities were adjusted (see table 1). </span></span></span></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Significance was considered when P< 0,05.</span></span></span></p> <p><strong><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Results </span></span></span></strong></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Patients that reached OMT had a better vital prognoses compared to patients that did not reach it during follow-up period (mortality 1,6% vs 9,5%, p= 0,006). Mean follow-up time was similar in two groups (498 vs 478 days, P= 0,43). Also, secondary endpoint (MACE) occurred significantly fewer times in subgroup of patients that reach OMT (23,08% vs 76% of pts, P= 0,001). Kaplan-Meier survival curve can be seen in figure 1.</span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="color:#000000">After subgroup stratification patients that reached at least 50% of target doses in only one or two of class drugs had significantly better prognoses compared to patients without 50% of target dose in any drug class and similar between them. (3,5%vs 2,2% vs 18,8% respectively, P<0,001). </span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Patients that reach OMT were significantly younger and with better renal function. Other basal characteristics were similar.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Discussion</strong></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Calibri"><span style="font-size:medium">Our results suggests that reaching OMT of at least one heart failure class can have a significant impact in heart failure prognosis. As expected patients on OMT of all drugs classes had less MACEs and longer survival. Basal renal function and age, but not kalemia, were main predictive factors to reach OMT. </span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site