Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
The relative pulmonary to systemic pressure ratio as a measure of prognostic value in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension – the never-ending quest to improve risk stratification.
Session:
Posters - F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Speaker:
João Grade Santos
Congress:
CPC 2021
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
Subtheme:
21.2 Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure – Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Session Type:
Posters
FP Number:
---
Authors:
João Grade Santos; Ana Rita Pereira; Mariana Martinho; Barbara Ferreira; Alexandra Briosa; Sofia Alegria; Filipa Ferreira; Rita Calé; Sofia Almeida; Hélder Pereira
Abstract
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">Introduction:</span></span></strong> <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">The relative pulmonary to systemic pressure ratio, calculated by mean pulmonary arterial pressure/mean arterial pressure (mPAP/MAP), has been already studied and of proven value in the context of cardiac surgery. However, little is known on the prognostic value of this parameter in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">Purpose:</span></span></strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222"> Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of the </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">relative pulmonary to systemic pressure ratio in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">Methods</span></span></strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">: We performed a 9 year retrospective analysis of all patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension as diagnosed by right heart catheterization in a single expert centre. Medical records were analysed for demographic, procedural and outcome data.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">Results</span></span></strong><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">: Of the 321 patients assessed and submitted to RHC, 82 patients had the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension and were analysed. The mean age at time of diagnosis was 47 </span></span><span style="color:black">± 17 with a female preponderance (74%).</span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">In a median follow up of 5 ± 3,8 years; 24% of patients had an admission for cardiovascular (CV) causes, 39% progressed to the use of parenteric prostanoids, 2,4% were submitted to lung transplant and 36,6% had died;</span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#222222">A higher </span></span><span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">mPAP/MAP correlated significantly with death (Mann- Whitney U; p= 0,03) and a compositive of admissions for CV causes, progression to intravenous prostenoids, lung transplant and death (Mann- Whitney U; p= 0,006). In a model of</span></span> logistic regression the sole use of <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">mPAP/MAP parameter had a higher predictive ability for the compositive of events than a model based on the mean pulmonary artery pressure</span></span> (OR: 1285 95% CI 6,54 – 252728 p: 0,008; r<sup>2</sup> 0,23 vs OR: 1,051 95% CI 1,001 – 1,104 p: 0,046; r<sup>2</sup> 0,11). <span style="background-color:white"><span style="color:#212121">The ROC curve analysis demonstrated a greater discriminative capability of the model aswell (AUC 0,76; p= 0,002 vs AUC 0,71; p= 0,016), with the best cut-off value for mPAP/MAP defined as 0,5139 for a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 71%.</span></span></span></span></p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="color:#222222">Conclusions</span></span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="color:#222222">: </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><span style="background-color:white"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="color:#212121">The evaluation of the relative pulmonary to systemic pressure ratio may serve as a useful prognostic indicator, more adequate than the assessment of the mean pulmonary arterial pressure alone.</span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site