Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Functional mitral regurgitation profile and referral patterns for mitral valve intervention of a real-world cohort of heart failure patients
Session:
CO 06 - Valvulopatias
Speaker:
João Presume
Congress:
CPC 2021
Topic:
B. Imaging
Theme:
03. Imaging
Subtheme:
03.1 Echocardiography
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
João Presume; Francisco Albuquerque; Pedro Lopes; Pedro Freitas; Marisa Trabulo; Maria João Andrade; Miguel Mendes; Regina Ribeiras
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><u>Introduction:</u></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) frequently have significant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), which carries important prognostic impact. Randomized clinical trials on transcatheter mitral-valve repair have shown conflicting results, and their representativeness in real-world populations are unclear. This real-world study sought to identify the proportion of patients who would be eligible for mitral valve intervention and describe the current referral patterns at an academic center.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><u>Methods:</u></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">We conducted a single center cross-sectional study enrolling consecutive patients with HFrEF and FMR under guideline directed medical therapy from January 2010 to December 2018. Moderate FMR was defined as the presence of an effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) of ≥ 20mm<sup>2</sup> or a regurgitant volume (Regvol) of ≥ 30mL/beat, according to <span style="color:black">American Society of Echocardiography</span> <span style="color:black">guidelines.</span> Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic and treatment data were assessed. Main MITRA-FR and COAPT Trial eligibility criteria (NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricle end-systolic diameter, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and right ventricle dysfunction) were applied according to trial protocols. Patterns of referral for mitral valve intervention were assessed by pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiography for mitral regurgitation evaluation. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><u>Results:</u></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">A total of 175 patients with at least moderate FMR were included in the analysis (mean age 70 ±12 years, 80% male, mean LVEF 32% ±9). </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">After applying the main eligibility criteria for each study, 73.7% (n=129) of patients would have been enrolled in MITRA-FR trial, whereas only 27.4% (n=48) patients would have met criteria for COAPT trial (Figure 1). Patients with MITRA-FR profile had a mean EROA 25 ± 8 mm<sup>2</sup>; mean Regvol 36 ± 9 mL/beat; mean LVEDV 205 ± 72 mL; EROA/LVEDV ratio 0.13 ± 0.04. “COAPT-like” patients had a mean EROA 33<sup> </sup>± 10 mm<sup>2</sup>; mean Regvol 48 ± 13 mL/beat; mean LVEDV 203 ± 65 mL; mean EROA/LVEDV ratio 0.17 ±0.05.</span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Only 13.1% (n=23) were referred for transesophageal echocardiography in order to establish the criteria of feasibility for mitral intervention. A total of 16 patients (9.1%) were submitted to mitral valve intervention during follow-up. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><strong><u>Conclusion:</u></strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">In a real-world population of HFrEF patients with significant FMR, more than one fourth of patients had a “COAPT-like” profile and could have benefited from percutaneous mitral valve intervention. The referral rate for evaluation for a potential intervention was low, which precludes patients from benefiting from this type of treatment.</span></span></p>
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site