Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Single-Shot compared to Point-by-Point Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Success
Session:
CO 13- Atrial fibrilation
Speaker:
Rita Rocha
Congress:
CPC 2021
Topic:
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
Theme:
05. Atrial Fibrillation
Subtheme:
05.2 Atrial Fibrillation - Epidemiology, Prognosis, Outcome
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Rita Caldeira Da Rocha; Rita Carvalho; Mafalda Carrington; Afonso Ferreira; Maria Brito; Gustavo Silva; Nuno Cortez Dias; Luís Carpinteiro; Fausto Pinto; João de Sousa
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Pulmonary vein electrical isolation is the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The two widely used approaches are point-by-point radiofrequency application or single-shot therapy. Catheter AF ablation is effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm. However, efficacy is limited by a high rate of AF recurrence, after an initially successful procedure. </p> <p>Purpose: To evaluate AF initial ablation successfulness using single-shot techniques and compare them to the conventional procedure (point-by-point using irrigated- tip ablation catheter). </p> <p>Methods: We analyzed, from a single center, all patients submitted to an index AF ablation procedure and its successfulness. The last was defined as AF, atrial tachycardia or flutter recurrence (with a duration superior to 30 seconds) event-free survival, determined by Holter and/or event recorder. These exams were performed at 6 and 12months and then annually, until 5 years after the procedure. </p> <p>Results: From November 2004 to November 2020, 821patients were submitted to a first AF ablation (male patients 67.2% (N=552), mean age of 59±12years old). Paroxysmal AF (PAF) was present in 62.9% (N=516), short-duration persistent AF in 21.8% (N=179) and long-standing persistent in 15.3% (N=126). Ablation techniques were irrigated tip catheter point-by-point (PbP) ablation in 266 patients (32,4%) and single-shot (SS) techniques in the remaining 555(67,6%), including PVAC in 294 (35,8%), balloon cryo-ablation in 225(27,4%) and nMARQ in 36(4,4%). Globally, AF ablation had a one-year success rate of 72.5%, and 56.2% at 3 years. A significant difference between AF type was found: arrhythmic recurrence risk was 58% higher in persistent AF (PeAF) (HR 1.58;95%IC 1,22-2,04; p<0.001). In patients presenting with PAF, success was significantly higher in those submitted to SS technique (HR:0.69;95%CI 0,47-0,90;p=0.046), while those with PeAF had similar results. </p> <p>Conclusion: In this single center analysis almost three-quarters of AF patients had achieved one-year event-free survival, and more than a half reached long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia. Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation submitted to single-shot procedure had a higher success-rate. Moreover, our study confirmed previous data regarding a lower success rate in PeAF linking AF classification to the ablation outcome.</p>
Video
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site