Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Underdosing fragile patients - are we helping or harming?
Session:
Posters 4 - Écran 6 - Miscelânea
Speaker:
José Lopes De Almeida
Congress:
CPC 2019
Topic:
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
Theme:
24. Stroke
Subtheme:
24.5 Stroke - Prevention
Session Type:
Posters
FP Number:
---
Authors:
José Lopes De Almeida; Adriana Girão; I Barreiro; S Martinho; R Baptista; M Ferreira; Armando Carvalho; R Santos; L Gonçalves
Abstract
<p><strong>Background:</strong> An individualized approach should be taken regarding the utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in frail and elderly populations with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that among an elderly and frail population, where the risk of bleeding, both real and perceived, is very high, the proportion of patients with a dose regimen different from the formal indication would be particularly high due to potential underdosing.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> We conducted a retrospective, observational study enrolling 327 patients with AF admitted to an Internal Medicine ward during a 1-year period and discharged with a DOAC prescription. We divided the population in 2 groups: patients prescribed a reduced dose without formal dose reduction criteria (underdosed, n=170) and the rest of the population (n=157), which included adequately dosed patients, both with normal dose (n=99) and correctly reduced dose (n=43) and overdosed patients (n=15). A 1-year follow-up was completed for all patients, assessing the following outcomes: all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism and major bleeding.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Patients were elderly (81.9±7.68) and frail (Katz index 3.35±2.36). Apixaban was the most commonly prescribed NOAC (38.8%), followed by rivaroxaban (36.4%) and dabigatran (24.8%). Among underdosed patients, apixaban was prescribed in 45.3% of patients, dabigatran in 29.4% and rivaroxaban 25.3%. Although only 18.3% of patients had clinical criteria for dose reduction, 65.4% were discharged with reduced dose and thus 52% were underdosed.</p> <p>Regarding 1-year outcomes, mortality (40.8% vs 25.5%, RR=1.6, p=0.003) and the combined stroke, systemic embolism and major bleeding event rate (10.1% vs 3.2%, RR=3.16, p=0.015) were higher for underdosed patients.</p> <p>Among underdosed patients, comparing with the rest of the population, the increased ischemic events rate (ischemic stroke and systemic embolism) did not reached statistical significance (3.7% vs. 1.9%, p=0.5), but it did for hemorrhagic events (major bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke) (6.1% vs 0.6%, p=0.01).</p> <p>On multivariate analysis, even after considering adjustment for age, Katz and CHAD2VAS2C scores, renal function and DOAC prescribed, DOAC underdosing was associated with a higher risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic events (HR = 3.51, 95%CI 1.08-11.38). However, it lost its independent negative effect regarding mortality (HR 1.32, 95%CI 0.87-1.99).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> There is a significant proportion of frail and elderly patients with AF that are underdosed. This subset has a significant survival disadvantage, eventually reflecting prescription bias. However, underdosed patients have also a higher event rate of both ischemic and hemorrhagic events, suggesting that underdosing fragile patients is not an effective strategy and that instead it may be hazardous.</p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site