Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Endocardial vs. epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation: a propensity score matched analysis
Session:
CO - Prémio Jovem Investigador (Investigação Clínica)
Speaker:
Daniel Jorge Nascimento Matos
Congress:
CPC 2019
Topic:
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
Theme:
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
Subtheme:
08.4 Ventricular Arrhythmias and SCD - Treatment
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Daniel Nascimento Matos; Diogo Cavaco; Pedro Freitas; António Miguel Ferreira; Gustavo Da Rocha Rodrigues; João Carmo; Maria Salomé Carvalho; Francisco Moscoso Costa; Pedro Lopes Do Carmo; Francisco Bello Morgado; Miguel Mendes; Pedro Adragão
Abstract
<p><strong>INTRODUCTION:</strong></p> <p>Direct comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes of endocardial vs. epicardial catheter ablation techniques for drug-resistant ventricular tachycardia (VT) have been scarcely reported.</p> <p>We aim to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of endocardial vs. epicardial catheter ablation (END-ABL and EPI-ABL, respectively) in a propensity score (PS) matched population.</p> <p><strong>METHODS</strong>:</p> <p>Single-center observational registry including 215 consecutive patients who underwent END-ABL (181) or EPI-ABL (n=34) for drug-resistant VT between January 2007 and June 2018. Efficacy endpoint was defined as VT-free survival after catheter ablation, while safety outcomes were defined by 30-days mortality and procedure-related complications. A propensity score was used to match patients in a 1:1 fashion according to the following variables: VT storm at presentation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV at presentation, ischemic ethology, presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and previous endocardial catheter ablation. Independent predictors of VT recurrence were assessed by Cox regression.</p> <p><strong>RESULTS:</strong></p> <p>The PS yielded two groups of 31 patients each well matched for baseline characteristics (Table 1). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (IQR 1-3), 58% (n=18) ENDO-ABL patients had VT recurrence vs. 26% (n=8) in the EPI-ABL group (P=0.020). The yearly rates of VT recurrence were 28%/year for END-ABL vs. 11%/year for EPI-ABL (P=0.021). Multivariate survival analysis identified previous endocardial ablation (HR= 3.52; 95%CI 1.17-10.54, p=0.026) and VT storm at presentation (HR=3.57; 95%CI 1.50-8.50, p=0.004) as independent predictors of VT recurrence. EPI-ABL was independently associated with fewer VT recurrences (HR=0.28; 95 CI 0.12-0.69, p=0.005), but only in patients with a previous endocardial ablation (p for interaction = 0.004) - Figure A.</p> <p>No patients died at 30-days post-procedure. Hospital length of stay was similar between END-ABL and EPI-ABL (5 vs. 4 days respectively, p=0.139), as was the complication rate (6.5% vs. 12.9% respectively, p=0.390), although driven by different causes (Table 1).</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong></p> <p>VT storm at presentation and previous catheter ablation were independent predictors of VT recurrence. In patients with a previous failed endocardial catheter ablation, epicardial ablation seems to provide greater VT-free survival than repeat endocardial ablation. Both strategies seem equally safe.</p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site