Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Measuring integrated backscatter in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Session:
SESSÃO DE POSTERS 39 - IMAGEM CARDÍACA NA ESTENOSE AÓRTICA
Speaker:
André Paulo Ferreira
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
B. Imaging
Theme:
03. Imaging
Subtheme:
03.1 Echocardiography
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
André Paulo Ferreira; Julien Lopes; Pedro Rio; Ana Teresa Timóteo; Ana Leal; Fernanda Varela; Duarte Cacela; Ana Galrinho; Rui Cruz Ferreira
Abstract
<p><strong>Background</strong>: Calibrated integrated backscatter (cIB) derived by 2D echocardiography quantifies myocardial ultrasound reflectivity, and it has been used in previous studies as a surrogate for myocardial fibrosis. Before the advent of other cardiac imaging techniques, it was a major focus of tissue characterization research.<br /> <br /> <strong>Purpose</strong>: We examined whether cIB may help identify patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) at risk of procedure-related complications.<br /> <br /> <strong>Methods</strong>: Consecutive patients submitted to transfemoral TAVI between January and December 2022 were routinely imaged by echocardiography in the five days peri-procedure. Calibrated integrated backscatter was obtained from the parasternal long-axis view (PLAX) by subtracting pericardial cIB intensity from myocardial septal and posterior wall average cIB. Patients with poor PLAX views were excluded from the study. Measurements of cIB, expressed in decibels, were performed at end-diastole. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major TAVI-related complications.<br /> <br /> <strong>Results</strong>: Of 149 patients who underwent TAVI during the study period, 131 had a reasonable acoustic window for cIB measurement and were included in the study. Patient mean age was 82.1±6.9 years, and 62% were female. At baseline, 84% of patients had preserved left ventricle function, the mean aortic mean gradient was 47.3±14.8 mmHg, and the mean Euroscore II was 5.34±3.24. The global mean cIB measured was 19.74±7.56 dB. No significant differences were found in the myocardial wall ultrasound reflectivity in patients with TAVI-related major complications (20.63±10.8 vs 19.6±6.9 dB, p=0.587), which were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus. However, cIB was significantly higher in patients who had post-TAVI conduction disturbances (21.09±7.72 vs 18.11±7.06 dB, p=0.026), including left bundle branch block and atrioventricular block. There was also a negative correlation of cIB with aortic annulus area as measured by computed tomography (r(129)= -0.19, p=0.032), and cIB was also significantly higher in patients who had a pre-TAVI estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 (22.42±7.17 vs 19.56±6.88 dB, p=0.043).<br /> <br /> <strong>Conclusion</strong>: Our data disfavors the use of cIB as a predictor of major TAVI-related complications, but it suggests that cIB assessment could add value in identifying patients at risk of conduction disturbances in post-TAVI procedures.</p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site