Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Navigating the Coronary Crossroads: Left main artery bifurcating lesions, a single centre PCI results
Session:
SESSÃO DE POSTERS 40 - INTERVENÇÃO CORONÁRIA
Speaker:
Rita Louro
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Theme:
25. Interventional Cardiology
Subtheme:
25.2 Coronary Intervention
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Rita Louro; Rafael Viana; Carla Silva; Orlando Luquengo; Marta Figueiredo; António Almeida; Miguel Carias; David Neves; Ângela Bento; Renato Fernandes; Gustavo Sá Mendes; Lino Patrício
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">The management of patients with left main coronary artery (LM) disease presents a dilemma in medicine, with the ongoing debate between the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), current literature favours CABG in SYNTAX ≥22, due to more complex coronary anatomies.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>METHODS: </strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">Retrospective analysis, in a single centre between 2010 and 2024, of 114 patients with bifurcating LM disease treated percutaneously to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes compared to those of the literature. The primary outcome was composed of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or target lesion revascularization. Results at this centre were compared with expected cumulative long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) for PCI and CABG in SYNTAX. Expected results were retrieved from the SYNTAX Score logistic regression.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>RESULTS: </strong></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">A total of 113 patients were included, with a median follow-up (FUP) of 38 months (10 lost to FUP). Regarding baseline characteristics, the population had a mean age of 70.8±11.1 years, 77.2% were men. The presentation was chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) in 42.1% and STEMI in 30.7%. The mean SYNTAX score was 27.0±11.8. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">Patients with more complex coronary anatomy, as described in the literature, exhibit higher rates of MACCE: 18.9% for SYNTAX <22, 19.5% for SYNTAX 22-33, and a significantly higher 42.9% for SYNTAX ≥ 33, detailed outcomes are presented in the table. These MACCE results, according to SYNTAX Score, are lower than expected for percutaneous approach and comparable to CABG in SYNTAX <22 and 22-33. In SYNTAX ≥ 33, the MACCE rate was higher than expected for PCI and CABG. A subgroup analysis of patients with SYNTAX ≥33 revealed a MACCE rate of 25% in those presenting with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">: </span></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">Although the Syntax Score is an older tool, it remains valuable for patient stratification and should not be abandoned, as it provides an assessment of disease burden. In patients with a Syntax < 33, PCI outcomes in our experience are comparable to CABG, </span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">even with the inclusion of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In p</span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">atients with Syntax > 33 CABG remains slightly superior in CCS (25% vs 21.9%) due to the higher disease burden. However, in ACS PCI is often performed due to the impossibility of CABG.</span></span></span> <span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:"Aptos Light",sans-serif">These results suggest that the percutaneous approach is a valid solution, particularly in the context of long surgical waiting lists.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site