Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Prognostic Value of QRS Variation Following TAVI: A Predictor of Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Mortality at 1-Year Follow up
Session:
SESSÃO DE POSTERS 05 - TAVI 1
Speaker:
Catarina Lagoas Pohle
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Theme:
25. Interventional Cardiology
Subtheme:
25.3 Non-coronary Cardiac Intervention
Session Type:
Cartazes
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Catarina Lagoas Pohle; André Lobo; Marta Catarina Almeida; Pedro Braga; Daniel Caeiro; Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Introduction </span></span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Conduction abnormalities are common following TAVI, with post-TAVI QRS duration (QRSd) often studied as a predictor of adverse outcomes. However, the prognostic significance of QRSd variation—the change from baseline QRSd to post-TAVI QRSd—has received less attention. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between QRS variation and adverse outcomes and compares its prognostic utility with post-TAVI QRSd alone.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Methods </span></span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on TAVI patients from 2015 to 2021, excluding those with prior pacemakers or with insufficient data. </span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Primary endpoint was a composite of worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1 year (defined as a reduction of more than 10 percentage points from pre-TAVI to 1-year follow-up (FUP)) and all-cause mortality at 1year FUP.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Results </span></span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">A total of 296 patients were included (mean age 80 ±7 years). Prior to TAVI, 5.1% (n=15) of patients had pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) and 7.4% (n=22) had pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB). During in-hospital stay following TAVI, 33.8% (n=100) of patients developed new-onset LBBB, 1.4% (n=4) developed RBBB, and 11.2% (n=29) required pacemaker implantation.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Median QRSd increased from 101ms (IQR 27) before TAVI to 126ms (IQR 50) immediately after the procedure, and to 114ms (IQR 49) at discharge, with a mean inicial QRSd increase of 19±26ms and 18±26ms at discharge.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">One year after TAVI, patients with new-onset sustained rhythm disturbances had a significantly lower mean LVEF (50.0%, IQR 14.8) compared to those without rhythm disturbances (58.0%, IQR 8.0; p<0.001).</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">In the univariate analysis for the primary endpoint, QRSd variation at discharge demonstrated the highest predictive value (Wald 11.383, p= 0.001), followed by new onset persistent LBBB at 1 year FUP (Wald 9.141, p=0.002) and QRSd variation immediately after TAVI (Wald 6.609, p=0.010). QRSd immediately after TAVI or at discharge did not show statistical significance as predictors of the primary outcome (p=0.188 and p=0.062, respectively), as presented in Table 1.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">QRSd variation at discharge was the only independent predictor of the composite endpoint of worsening LVEF and all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up. Each 1-ms increase in QRSd variation was associated with a 3.8% higher odds of reaching the composite endpoint (OR 1.038, 95% CI 1.009–1.069; Wald Chi-Square = 6.520; p = 0.011).</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">Conclusion </span></span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Avenir Book"">This study highlights the QRSd variation may offer a dynamic assessment of risk, particularly for LVEF worsening and mortality at 1 year FUP, especially in comparison to QRSd alone. The identification of optimal QRSd variation thresholds could help enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site