Login
Search
Search
0 Dates
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0 Events
CPC 2018
CPC 2019
Curso de Atualização em Medicina Cardiovascular 2019
Reunião Anual Conjunta dos Grupos de Estudo de Cirurgia Cardíaca, Doenças Valvulares e Ecocardiografia da SPC
CPC 2020
CPC 2021
CPC 2022
CPC 2023
CPC 2024
CPC 2025
0 Topics
A. Basics
B. Imaging
C. Arrhythmias and Device Therapy
D. Heart Failure
E. Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
G. Aortic Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stroke
H. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
I. Hypertension
J. Preventive Cardiology
K. Cardiovascular Disease In Special Populations
L. Cardiovascular Pharmacology
M. Cardiovascular Nursing
N. E-Cardiology / Digital Health, Public Health, Health Economics, Research Methodology
O. Basic Science
P. Other
0 Themes
01. History of Cardiology
02. Clinical Skills
03. Imaging
04. Arrhythmias, General
05. Atrial Fibrillation
06. Supraventricular Tachycardia (non-AF)
07. Syncope and Bradycardia
08. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)
09. Device Therapy
10. Chronic Heart Failure
11. Acute Heart Failure
12. Coronary Artery Disease (Chronic)
13. Acute Coronary Syndromes
14. Acute Cardiac Care
15. Valvular Heart Disease
16. Infective Endocarditis
17. Myocardial Disease
18. Pericardial Disease
19. Tumors of the Heart
20. Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology
21. Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure
22. Aortic Disease
23. Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
24. Stroke
25. Interventional Cardiology
26. Cardiovascular Surgery
27. Hypertension
28. Risk Factors and Prevention
29. Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology
30. Cardiovascular Disease in Special Populations
31. Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
32. Cardiovascular Nursing
33. e-Cardiology / Digital Health
34. Public Health and Health Economics
35. Research Methodology
36. Basic Science
37. Miscellanea
0 Resources
Abstract
Slides
Vídeo
Report
CLEAR FILTERS
Decoding the Decades: Tafamidis Efficacy Across Different Age Groups in ATTR-CM patients
Session:
SESSÃO DE COMUNICAÇÕES ORAIS 06 – EXPLORANDO A AMILOIDOSE CARDÍACA: INOVAÇÕES NO DIAGNÓSTICO, PROGNÓSTICO E TRATAMENTO
Speaker:
Catarina Gregório
Congress:
CPC 2025
Topic:
F. Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, Pulmonary, Congenital Heart Disease
Theme:
17. Myocardial Disease
Subtheme:
17.4 Myocardial Disease – Treatment
Session Type:
Comunicações Orais
FP Number:
---
Authors:
Catarina Gregório; Ana Abrantes; Miguel Raposo; João Fonseca; Marta Vilela; Diogo Ferreira; João Cravo; Catarina Campos; Isabel Conceição; Fausto J. Pinto; Dulce Brito; João R. Agostinho
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Introduction</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a severe condition primarily affecting elderly patients (pts), leading to heart failure (HF) and increased mortality. In a sub-analysis of ATTR-ACT, tafamidis 61mg demonstrated efficacy for pts with ATTR-CM both in those aged <80 and those aged ≥80 years, improving quality of life and functional capacity. However, it remains unclear whether the efficacy of tafamidis varies significantly among different age subgroups within the elderly population. </span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Aim</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">: To assess the impact of tafamidis 61mg in ATTR-CM pts aged <75, 75-85, and >85 years. </span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Methods</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">: Single-center retrospective study of ATTR-CM pts, categorized into 3 groups based on age: <75, 75-85, and >85 years. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the composite endpoint of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) death.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Results</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">: 89 pts with ATTR-CM were included (<75 years: 23 pts; 75–85 years: 40 pts; >85 years: 26 pts). Patients <75 years had a significantly higher prevalence of hereditary ATTR-CM (p<0.001). Effort dyspnea was the predominant initial symptom in the 75–85 and >85-year subgroups (p=0.002), whereas younger pts more commonly presented with carpal tunnel syndrome (p=0.04) or sensory-motor polyneuropathy (p=0.001). Older pts (75–85 and >85 years) were predominantly in NYHA class II/III (p=0.009) and required higher diuretic doses (p=0.08), while younger pts showed better functional capacity, with a higher proportion in NYHA class I (p<0.001). NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in pts >75 years (p<0.001). At baseline, groups were comparable in LVEF and LV hypertrophy (p=NS), but global longitudinal strain was more impaired in pts >85 years (<75: -21.7±0.8, 75–85: -14.5±1.1, >85: -10.1±2.3; p=0.039) – Table 1.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">During a follow-up period of 24.9±2.1 months, tafamidis treatment in pts aged >85 years was associated with a greater reduction in NT-proBNP compared to the other 2 groups (p=0.041) and a reduction in diuretic doses compared to pts aged <75 years (p=0.044). However, no improvement in NYHA functional class (p=NS) or significant differences in KCCQ score were observed across the groups at follow-up (p=NS). Echocardiographic parameters remained comparable among all groups throughout the study. Similarly, the composite endpoint of HF hospitalizations and CV death showed no statistically significant differences between groups during follow-up (LogRank 5.71, p=0.06 – Figure 1). A sub-analysis of pts aged ≥90 years (all with ATTRwt) revealed outcomes consistent with the overall population, emphasizing that this very elderly subgroup also benefits from tafamidis therapy.</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:#000000">: This study highlights the benefits of tafamidis in elderly pts, including those ≥85 years, and supports its use in all age groups to improve cardiovascular outcomes in ATTR-CM.</span></span></span></p>
Slides
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
Visit our site